<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Data Governance on Kailas Venkitasubramanian</title>
    <link>/tags/data-governance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Data Governance on Kailas Venkitasubramanian</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/data-governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Some Thoughts on AI-Augmented Community Research at the Charlotte Urban Institute</title>
      <link>/blog/posts/2026-02-11-ai-augmented-community-research/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/blog/posts/2026-02-11-ai-augmented-community-research/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I thought of compiling a few thoughts on using AI at the institute or broadly in organizations similar to ours. I&amp;rsquo;ve been using AI tools in my research for over a year and I still can&amp;rsquo;t decide if I&amp;rsquo;m more excited or more unsettled but I feel it&amp;rsquo;s more of the former these days. But this ambivalence feels like the right starting point for a conversation about where we, as an institute built on community trust and research, actually want to go with this. When I say AI, I mean the generative AI kind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
