<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Open Science on Kailas Venkitasubramanian</title>
    <link>/categories/open-science/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Open Science on Kailas Venkitasubramanian</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/categories/open-science/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Reproducible Research Framework at the Charlotte Urban Institute: Why It Matters Now</title>
      <link>/blog/series/reproducible-research-series/2022-07-08-building-blocks-of-a-reproducible-research-framework/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/blog/series/reproducible-research-series/2022-07-08-building-blocks-of-a-reproducible-research-framework/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In recent years, conversations about reproducibility have moved from academic journals into policy circles, foundations, and government agencies. What was once framed as a “replication crisis” in psychology has broadened into a wider concern about the credibility, transparency, and cumulative nature of scientific work across disciplines (Open Science Collaboration, 2015).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For those of us engaged in quantitative community research—especially in dynamic regional contexts like the Charlotte metropolitan area—reproducibility is not merely a philosophical concern. It is an operational one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
